The Charismatic Trigger

The Trigger

Those of us in the Pentecostal/Charismatic movement revere the "moving" of the Holy Spirit. Moments where God's presence is palpable, where signs and wonders arise unbidden and lives are transformed in a flash is the chocolate we crave. A chocoholic is not satisfied to wait with baited breath in hopes of the next chance to indulge her taste. She figures out how to ensure a ready supply of her desired confection.

There are all kinds of books, videos, conferences, and training schools advertising their ability to inculcate the necessary skills and understanding to replicate whatever example or model of Spirit visitation they're promoting. In fact, every time so much as a whiff of revival wafts on the air[waves], folk rush to the scent hoping to get a taste of the chocolate. If they're fortunate, they might just get some to take home with them.

Generally, what people learn from such things are techniques, or in other words, works. If they fast for so long or they pray so long, in concert with so many; if they confess all known sin and even the sins of others; if they clean up their acts to such and so a degree; if they begin to do this or that... you get the picture: Spiritual visitation comes in answer to works! What does the Bible say about such a construct? 

You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified. I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by observing the law, or by believing what you heard? Are you so foolish? After beginning with the Spirit, are you now trying to attain your goal by human effort? Have you suffered so much for nothing—if it really was for nothing? Does God give you his Spirit and work miracles among you because you observe the law, or because you believe what you heard?  Galatians 3:1-5

The Galatians didn't do anything in order to prime the pumps of the heavenly anointing. They just believed God's promise. That's the pattern of Abraham, it's the pattern of grace. We keep looking for that ever elusive, ever changing trigger that will launch the next Charismatic tidal wave, and we always end up looking at ourselves for the answer. The truth is that God wants to anoint us, wants to bless us, he promises to do so.

If the target is a new season of the Spirit moving among us, the only trigger that needs to be pulled is the trigger of faith.

The Trigger Finger

...eagerly desire spiritual gifts, especially the gift of prophecy   1 Corinthians 14:1

Christians have different opinions about what's really important in practice. No one could deny the centrality of love, for God, and for each other. Faith is absolutely essential, for whatever is not of faith is sin. Holiness cannot be done without, for without it, no one will see the Lord, (thankfully it's derivative). I wonder why we so rarely give "that which is of the Spirit" (πνευματικός) a seat at the table, despite what the Apostle Paul says about it in the verse above?

"Eager desire" is not even close to describing most Christians pursuit of spiritual things. At best their pursuit is hit and miss, completely negligent, or even purposeful avoidance. Given that, is it really perplexing that God doesn't move in his church the way he once did? Do we even want the Holy Spirit to move amongst us, really?

What is called for, at least according to the Word, is zealousness-- a roiling, boiling, heated passion to see and experience the things Holy Spirit can inspire.

We can't, and we're not meant to, do this alone, as singular entities. The scriptural pattern is zealousness in concert. There were 120 in the upper room, and the verse above is addressed to the church in Corinth. As much as God loves any of us individually, there are promises and experiences in the Holy Spirit he intends for us to realize together.

The expressions, the sensible exertions, the remarkable evidences of the Spirit's presence and activity are not going to rain down on the indifferent, nor drop on the doubtful, nor inspire the insipid. Religion is truly a vain, sickening spectacle. Are we satisfied to go through the motions, and rituals, and lifeless assemblies, when according to the plan, we're meant to experience and demonstrate the very presence of God. 

Faith embraces the promise of God-- not one of those hands on the shoulder dip inward facsimile hugs, but one of those bear hugs my old friend Demetrius used to lift me off the ground with. We have been promised in the Holy Spirit more than we have let ourselves be satisfied with. We have found comfort in the dull and unchallenging, we've been reticent to leave ourselves behind and launch out in trust in the Spirit. It's time for some passion.

When faith puts its finger on the trigger, it either shoots or it dies. Let's opt for life.

Where Does the Antichrist Arise?

Turkiye is an interesting place, prophetically speaking.

For years, Turkiye has been considered the most stable of the Middle Eastern nations. A member of NATO, a candidate for the European Union, one of the G-20, constitutionally secular, the Islamic (but non-Arab) country has been a beacon of reason in a sea of fanaticism and fascism. Though the population is all but 100% Muslim, since shortly after WWI the country has been more attached politically, even culturally, to Western Europe than to the Muslim Third World.

Things are changing. Turkiye is moving east!

If there ever was a place that could act as a bridge between the Muslim (21% of the world's population) and the non-Muslim world, Turkiye is that place. I would add, that it also follows, that if there was ever a leader who could bridge that gap, there's no more likely place for him to arise than Turkiye. Turkiye is situated, almost as no other place, to be the place to watch in the last days, a veritable hotbed for the development of the Antichrist.

The Apocalypse reveals that Pergamum (today Bergama in Turkiye) was the throne of Satan, the Antichrist's prime patron. According to Daniel's prophetic description of the antetype of the Antichrist, that ultimate figure will arise in the pattern of the King of the North. That antetype, Antiochus Epiphanes, had his capital in what is now Antakya, Turkiye. Is it mere coincidence that Satan and the type of the Antichrist both had their the "capital" in modern Turkiye? 

Whether or not that makes someone like Recep Tayyip Erdogan a possible candidate to be the Antichrist, I'll leave to you. 

Regardless, as far as the prophetic hotspot for the rising of the Antichrist, I think I'd have to say that the Turkiye's in the oven!

The Only Rule of Faith and Conduct

How long does it take people in any kind of group to veer off a course set by the founder of such a group?

Human will is strong, unmanageable, and hubris drives some to seek to imprint their own brand on what someone else had started. Paul endeavored in his day to not succumb to such a temptation; in our day, there are more than a few anecdotes circling about purportedly witnessing the reality of such among us. Someone founds a company, a church, a ministry, leads it successfully toward the attainment of a vision, dies, and in comes Jr. or the next one up and everything changes. The organization loses its soul.

I remember well the so called, third generation rule I first learned of in Bible College: by the third generation, the descendants of a revival have lost touch with its experience and do not share the passion or drive for its distinctives that the revived generation had. Between the founders and the third generation drift sets in. I think we actually see this reality even within one generation, but by the third, it is so unmistakably clear as to be unmistakeable.

Given this proven human trait, I'm puzzled by those who rely on church history to boost their notions of what was a more pristine, and therefore more authoritative, approach to doctrine and practice. They reason that those who lived closer to the first generation must have had a better grasp on the original than those further removed in time. The problem with that approach is that it ignores the reality of what we see before our own eyes-- humans drift, and rather quickly from the original visions of founding leaders.

We have no further to look for the start of such than the New Testament, mostly written by ~65 AD, itself. Virtually all of the epistles and certainly Revelation 2 and 3 are filled with rebukes and admonitions against the drift that was well under way before the Apostles, handpicked by Christ to pass on the faith, were cold in the ground. To give the drifters that followed the Apostles, even those from the earliest days in the first and second centuries, near the same doctrinal authority as the Apostles themselves is nothing but an invitation to play Leapfrog or Whisper Down the Alley with our souls.

 

For the Catholic and Orthodox churches this certainly is a critical issue, but Protestants are not exempt from resting the warrant to state what the scriptures do not on the backs of the church fathers. The faith was once delivered to the saints, and written about by those that did that entrusting. No one else but them is a reliable authority for doctrine and practice. Therefore, the scripture itself stands as the only objective basis for knowing what the unfiltered, untainted faith is and how it is to be practiced.

When I met Jesus personally, in my first few days as a Christian, and I asked him how I could know what was of him, he did not tell me to listen to my elders or even to a line of elders from way back, he told me to look to his Word. Since that experience, and hopefully always, my only rule of faith and conduct has been the Bible. My hope is that you adopt the same perspective.

God In the Old Testament vs. God In the New Testament

The link between the Old Testament and New is problematic for many Christians. It has been since the first century, it will likely be until Jesus returns. Today's typical evangelical view of the subject might be summarized as the moral law remains but the ceremonial law has passed away.

To which I say, "rubbish!"

The law as a means or a measure of relationship with God, moral, ceremonial or otherwise, is caput. The law never worked as means of achieving rightness with God, and it never could have. It wasn't meant to. It was no more than a means of restraining the Jews until Christ showed up and of uncovering, for any exposed to it, the fundamental sinful nature of mankind. It actually fertilizes our innate sinfulness, and offers no remedy nor instruction as how to overcome it.

Those who choose to live by a legal principle, inspired though it may be in the Old Testament, are fallen from grace and apart from the benefits of Christ, even if they call themselves Christian. So is there some benefit to the Old that is still viable in the realm of the New Testament? Yes, for there is a revelation of God there and the intimation of Christ.

People have claimed that the Old Testament God is different than the New, but that is an utter impossibility. There is but one God and he is immutable. What God revealed himself to be in the Old Testament, he still is today and always will be. Any conception from the New Testament cannot be taken to adapt, assuage, adjust, or evolve what God was in the Old. He is that he is.

For some this may present a difficulty. Aligning the Old Testament martial characteristics of God with what appear to be the touchy-feely graces of the New can prove to be a climb up Everest. God, however, does not change and we need to let his self-disclosure speak for itself. With a cat in one arm and a dog in the other, we must wrap our arms around the totality of all he reveals himself to be and embrace God for who he is, majestic and enigmatic.

God, as we're introduced to him through our friends Moses and the Prophets, may be a bit scary, even a lot scary, but in order to truly know the inviting God of our friends the Apostles, it is incumbent upon us to take all biblical revelation about God and his character seriously-- as unassailable truth. When considering the nature of God as he's revealed himself to be in the Bible, it's best to take the advise of an old children's song and make new friends but keep the old.

Why Is Grace So Amazing?

We need to be near God. Just to be in his presence is to know life, and there, fullness of joy is the very air breathed. God certainly has charisma, as much as a being could have, but it's more-- he has substance and energy, he is zoe. If we are separated from God, all that is shut off from us and death ensues. If we are not in the light of his presence, there is nothing but darkness of soul, emptiness of heart, despair of tomorrow, and wasting away away into vanity.

God knows we need him, and yet our sin separates us from him. The discerning among us know that we need him and that our sin has separated us from him. Many who have such insight, in response, ache to be holy, righteous, in order to correspond to the God who is life. So they can be near him and breathe in what he is and live. Toil and struggle to align themselves with the holy God becomes the religious quest of such folk, but there are dangers lurking for such valiant efforts...

Glad of God, but disappointed with self, melancholy shadows their days. Grace, to them, is that God doesn't give them what they deserve. They do get to experience God, but with their heads hanging down, their own feet filling their view. But what about grace should be about us? Grace is not obsessed with our unworthiness nor our inabilities. Grace is about God, about his kindness, his love, his desire to share himself with all he has made.

Grace is entire in its grant of acceptance. There are no ifs, ands, or buts. Grace starts out with everything being right, and then works backwards. It leaves the subject peaceful, not striving, and never uncertain. Grace moves us to a place with God and a peace with him. Too much for our comprehension, our thinking often has to run after to catch up to grace.

Thankfully, grace has long arms and strong hands.

Grace is amazing because it elevates us to mountaintops we could never climb ourselves. Grace is not crampons, or oxygen tanks, nor downy jackets that aid us in achieving what we could never achieve on our own. Grace is a helicopter ride to the top. It brings us near God without self-consciousness of effort. We're not the issue, nor is our incapability of the climb. Grace is about the heart of God and how genuinely he wants us up there with him.

And the view up there standing beside him, his hand on our shoulder...   it's spectacular!

Depravity: Subtraction by Addition

How did mankind get so depraved?

Adam was not depraved when he was created, yet he sinned while in God's very presence within a perfect environment. Perhaps his was some sort of temporary depravity inspired by the Serpent, but it's plain to see from the account that the Serpent merely "reasoned" with the first couple and advocated an alternate view of God. The couple then concocted through their untainted, untouched, God-pronounced "good" being their own rationalization for rebellion to the command of God. The simple truth is that depravity had nothing to do with Adam or Eve's sinfulness.

According to my reading Romans 1, the pattern leading to depravity is laid out with an explanatory emphasis. Three times (vs. 24, 26, and 28), we are told that "God gave them over." In other words, depravity was the result of willfulness being expressed against God (sin), and God stepping back from mankind leaving them to their own devices. Therefore, depravity is a lack rather than a possession: an absence rather than a presence. Sin separates us from God and depravity is the vacuum. The order of development was not that depravity led to sin but that sin led to depravity.

That mankind since Adam and Eve has been born separated from God is beyond argument. Since the Fall, humans have been born in sin, are dead in spirit and are depraved as a result. We are capable of perceiving the good when presented it, but are always unable and unwilling to do anything with it. It is our innate distance from God that ensures our depravity. Nothing but a visitation of the Spirit of God can alleviate the condition.

If that is the case, then the effects of depravity can be mitigated by God coming near to the depraved. When the Spirit of God "speaks" to the depraved soul, the possibility of response is elicited. This was the case throughout history before Christ (it was how Old Testament saints reacted to God), and certainly remains the case afterwards. Ultimately, that Holy Spirit connection will be perfected when responders (believers) are made incorruptible and the dwelling of God is with man at the end of this present age.

In the meantime, what depraved mankind needs is to be contended for by God. That does not ensure that we won't sin or walk away from God, it's not irresistible (remember untainted Adam in the Garden), but it does open up the possibilities of faith and perseverance. If we yield to that contention, and welcome the Holy Spirit within, a life of faithful obedience to God becomes possible. The battle is not to rid ourselves of depravity, for depravity is merely a consequence of absence.

Depravity arose as an addition by subtraction, it can only be resolved by a subtraction by addition.

What we need is God within us.

Spreading the Wealth Around

Count off seven sabbaths of years—seven times seven years—so that the seven sabbaths of years amount to a period of forty-nine years. Then have the trumpet sounded everywhere on the tenth day of the seventh month; on the Day of Atonement sound the trumpet throughout your land. Consecrate the fiftieth year and proclaim liberty throughout the land to all its inhabitants. It shall be a jubilee for you; each one of you is to return to his family property and each to his own clan... In this Year of Jubilee everyone is to return to his own property. If you sell land to one of your countrymen or buy any from him, do not take advantage of each other. You are to buy from your countryman on the basis of the number of years since the Jubilee. And he is to sell to you on the basis of the number of years left for harvesting crops. When the years are many, you are to increase the price, and when the years are few, you are to decrease the price, because what he is really selling you is the number of crops. Do not take advantage of each other, but fear your God. (NIV)

This cryptic passage from the book of Leviticus is not in force for non-Jews, nor for the Church of Jesus Christ; nonetheless, I find it interesting in that it reveals, at least to some degree, how God looks upon the redistribution of wealth in an earthly economy. That should likewise be interesting to any American, given that our economy is supposedly one under God (at least that's what we say on our currency). Redistribution, the pariah of free-market capitalists everywhere, seems to be looked upon with favor, even ordered, by God.

Apparently, every 50 years, i.e. about a generation and a half, God wants the economic scale set back to zero. The land is to be redistributed, debt is to be forgiven, and slaves are to be set free. Why? It seems to me, God's objective was that inequities in society wouldn't become so entrenched as to produce a perpetual slave class, endlessly indentured to and beholden to the rich. And all the Republicans said, "Wha-a-a-t?!"

I've heard it said that a severe financial crisis crops up once or twice a century in the West. If 50 years is God's metric for resetting the playing field, do you think that perhaps there's a correlation? There may well be. Is it possible that in his mysterious governance amongst mankind, that once too much wealth is held by too few people, God wants things shaken up? And especially so if those people are his people.

One statistic that would be germane in watching for such a thing is the concentration of wealth-- the measure of the "rich getting richer, and the poor getting poorer."

The old adage, "it takes money to make money," is true and describes the mechanism though which wealth is concentrated. Some politicians have long cited the concentration of wealth and the need for redistribution as a justification for increasing the size and spending of government; however, making the government bigger (wealthier) doesn't make the poor wealthier. In fact, it just shifts the poor's indenturer from the rich to the government, while it surreptitiously keeps their slavery just as perpetual. 

Increasing spending among the poor doesn't actually make them wealthier, it only increases their share of consumption. That may not be a bad thing, but it doesn't shift the economic balance of power which is more correlated to wealth. If the U.S. government actually wanted to effect wealth distribution, the easiest place to start would be reforming the Social Security system. If every Social Security account holder actually owned the wealth accumulating in their name, each would be that much more wealthier.

Over the last couple of months much of the wealth of the rich has evaporated into thin air. That kind of thing hasn't occurred since the Great Depression--not exactly 50 years, but close enough for government work. The poor are not likely to be statistically poorer as result of this economic downturn (we'll have to see what unemployment ends up doing), but the rich sure will be. Could the Great Depression II, which we seem to be in the beginning throes of, be God's redistribution plan? It wouldn't be the first time God took things into his own hands to spread the wealth around in a rather draconian fashion.

To wit: The LORD, the God of their fathers, sent word to them through his messengers again and again, because he had pity on his people and on his dwelling place. But they mocked God's messengers, despised his words and scoffed at his prophets until the wrath of the LORD was aroused against his people and there was no remedy... The land enjoyed its sabbath rests; all the time of its desolation it rested, until the seventy years were completed in fulfillment of the word of the LORD spoken by Jeremiah. (NIV)

Vote for Life

Approximately thirty years ago, Evangelicals, no longer satisfied sitting on their hands as part of Nixon's silent majority, decided to speak up.

The Moral Majority, the Christian Coalition, and some of their companion groups arose with a vision of preserving America's religious roots and returning her to them through political engagement. I've always seen that ideal as a selective reading of history, namely, because America has always been a land of booze, getting rich quick, and the guy at the bottom of the food chain getting the shaft from the guys at the top. And let us not forget that for the bulk of our history, Africans have been held against their wills in slavery and women have had no political or legal say-so.

Are those really the roots we want to return to?

I do believe, in this country where people are the government, that Christians should be politically engaged, and in both major parties. We the people are responsible for what our political leaders do on our behalf. We're responsible if we don't vote, because we could have, and we should have. We're responsible if we do vote, particularly if the candidate we voted for wins and is seated in office. Other people in other times in other places in the world didn't have this responsibility, we do!

There's no running or hiding from it, political involvement is the cost of living in a representative democracy.

So how should we handle that responsibility? It's not so much about the whos of who's elected, but at what cost to our allegiance to God do we support and promote those whos. No politician is the answer to what ails us, Jesus alone has that power. Certainly, no singular politician, at least under our form of governance, is going to change everything. Really, most of what passes as politics is bluster and lie, and needs to be taken with a grain of salt.

The way I see it, the sooner we get these folks back to productive life after their public service the better!

There is, however, one issue that stands above all others in my viewpoint, and one for which we cannot lose heart in the struggle. When the most innocent among us are cold-bloodedly murdered day in and day out, nothing else can be right in the land. Being anti-abortion is not about returning to some fantasy about some former golden day in America, it is about life and death and we cannot shirk our responsibility. Christians must vote pro-life.

You may strategize about how to do that, whether by party affiliation or the individual candidate's stance, but make no mistake about it: you are the government and you are responsible for the choices government makes. What you can do to influence those choices is good and right for you to do, so long as it's not rebellious. By far, the easiest thing you can do is simply vote for life.

Revival Jesus

I've written before about my growing lack of enthusiasm for what is promoted as revival. The recent pseudo-revival at Lakeland only serves to reinforce those thoughts. Now, there was a time when I thought revival was just what the doctor ordered for the ailing church, I mean I came to Christ in the midst of a revivalistic wave, for goodness sake.

State College, Pennsylvania was a truly happening place in the late 70's and early 80's. People were coming to Christ hand over fist. Miracles were occurring. God's presence was readily experienced, fellowship was sweet. I was too naive at the time to realize that what was happening then was revival on a small scale. I thought that, that was just how true Christianity was practiced. It was like the Bible was happening in life.

It was only the subsequent study of church history that made me realize what had actually occurred then in State College, and I ached to see it occur again.

I still have that longing, but I'm reticent to get on the revival bandwagon these days. Frankly, the record of revivals since WWI has been spotty at best... "a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." They fall like a meteor, make a splash, but given just a short time, the waters go still with scarcely a ripple left to evidence that anything happened at all. Why? 

It seems to me, revival, as this generation knows it, tends to be about feelings of relief or emotional stirrings rather than about the person and majesty of Christ.

Folk lay in convulsing heaps bemoaning with loud sorrow their sinfulness longing for absolution, or fly around erratically like untied balloons in the joy of their spiritual experience. Either way, the emphasis is on the individual rather than Jesus, and eventually, such activity is bound to run out of steam when the self is tapped. Things then settle into a depressing, entropic sameness but lessness.

A few stalwart cowboys may try to rekindle the brands and restore the sizzle of flesh on fire, but their efforts tend to be more style than substance. Then the pining begins. All those folks want is to return to the experience, like addicts trying to catch that first rush again. I have to wonder why. Didn't they meet Jesus in the midst of all that experience? Wasn't he in himself sweeter than life? Didn't they joyously embark on a walk with him from then to eternity?

You see, I can't avoid the sneaking suspicion that what some of the revival hungry are really saying is that the Jesus thing doesn't truly work except in those special times. At all others, it produces substandard spirituality, with something missing, yielding no real satisfaction. The only Jesus worth experiencing is Revival Jesus. I've got to tell you, for me, that just does not compute. It's not what being a disciple, a brother, the redeemed is all about. It's not what is presented in the Bible.

It does not, and it never will get better than a personal, interactive fellowship with Christ. That is not revival, that is Christianity. I'll happily embrace, and longingly pray for a season of visitation and harvest, outpouring and filling for the church, but we need to keep our bearings straight. To love Revival Jesus better than Jesus everyday is to flirt with idolatry. For me, everyday Jesus, just as he is, is more than enough.

"I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ " Philippians 3:8